On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 08:39:09AM +0200, Michael Paesold wrote: > Tom Lane wrote:
> >The other possible solution that comes to mind is to invent the notion > >that a cast has a specific owner (which arguably it should have anyway) > >and then say that "system casts" are those whose owner is the original > >superuser. > > Just my toughts: I believe it's better when cast selection does not depend > on the search_path. It seems dangerous for objects that you don't usually > qualify with a schema. With all other objects in schemas I can think of, > you can easily write the full-qualified name. > > So I vote for the latter. So casts created by the original superuser don't get dumped? That's not good IMHO. But yes, schema-qualifying casts seems weird: '123'::someschema.user_type Is that even accepted by the grammar? -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "La fuerza no está en los medios físicos sino que reside en una voluntad indomable" (Gandhi) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
