Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It should be possible to make this work for bool_and and bool_or as those > are equivalent to min and max for the boolean type.
This would just be a matter of marking them properly in the catalogs. However, are they really equivalent in the corner cases? In particular, I think boolean AND across zero input rows is probably supposed to return TRUE, not NULL. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match