Reini Urban said: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>>Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>>What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin >>>> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If >>>> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform >>>> changes account for the regression. >>> >>>Sounds that way to me too, but it's disturbing. One would say they >>> broke their scheduler :-(. Possibly you should try to stir up some >>> interest among the Cygwin hackers in looking into this. >>> >> >> I'd like somebody else to report the same phenomenon first. Reini? > > Why plperl is broken I cannot say yet. > > I still have the same general IPC permission problem since about beta3. > Only very few cygwin hackers have this also. > I only got confirmation that the problem is in postgresql, not in > cygwin.
Hmm. Well, JimB got the same result yesterday that I have been seeing (the stats regression test failure), so I consider that sufficient confoirmation. I'm not quite sure what question I should be asking of the Cygwin people. Tom, Can you suggest something? I'll look at the plperl thing. That has also prompted me to add a buildfarm feature request to test perl, python and tcl if they are configured in. cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org