On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 01:35:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Should we perhaps also propagate grant insert on a table to grant > > select, update on dependent serial sequences? > > Doesn't really follow. That code is maintaining an invariant: the owner > of a table owns the associated indexes, toast table, sequences, etc. > There's no system-wide assumption that sequence privileges track table > privileges.
I brought this up a few months ago. Tom, weren't your objections based more on implementation concerns than on whether the idea itself had merit? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-10/msg00511.php -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
