On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:31:26 -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... but if we do INSERT INTO vfoo(col2) values ('some_string) the
> rewriter
> > cann resolv the value for col1. the reason is that views does not
> > inherit the defaults of the parent table. That is the reason you add
> > the ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ADD/DROP DEFAULT for views.
>
> > Ok, this is a problem for us, so we want to improve the rewriter to
> > see the default in the base table an add it as appropiate.
>
> Why do you not define the problem as "when we decide a view is
> updateable and create the needed rules for it, also create default
> values for it by copying up from the base tables"?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Well, that was our first thought. but what if the default value is
changed in the base table? then we have a problem, can we found in
what views we have to alter the default value in order to keep
consistency.
regards,
Jaime Casanova
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
