[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>
>>>That is hardly anything that I would feel comfortable with. Lets break
>>>this down into all the areas that are ambiguous:
>>>
>>>
>>There isn't anything ambiguous about this, nor is it credible that there
>>are implementations that don't follow the intent of the spec.
>>
>>
>
>How do you know the intent of the spec? I have seen no meta discussion
>about the behavior of the file descriptor integer returned from open. The
>Steven's book makes no such assumptions, and the steven's book (Advanced
>Programming in the UNIX Environment) is what people reference.
>
>
>
>
>
My copy of APUE says on page 49: "The file descriptor returned by open
is the lowest numbered unused descriptor. This is used by some
applications to open a new file on standard input, standard output, or
standard error."
Unless someone can show there's an actual problem this discussion seems
quite pointless.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
