[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>> Please see my posting about using a macro for snprintf.
> Wasn't the issue about odd behavior of the Win32 linker choosing the wrong
> vnsprintf?
You're right, the point about the macro was to avoid linker weirdness on
Windows. We need to do that part in any case. I think Bruce confused
that issue with the one about whether our version supported %n$
adequately ... which it doesn't just yet ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
