Linux and Solaris 10 x86 pass regression tests fine when I force the use of new
snprintf(). The problem should be win32 - specific. I will
investigate it throughly
tonight. Can someone experienced in win32 what can possibly be the problem?
Nick
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:07:16 +0100, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The new snpritnf code appears not to deal with 64-bit ints. I'm getting
> failures on win32 for int8 as well as all the time related tests (win32
> uses int8 for tinmestamps). Removing the snprintf code and falling back
> to the OS code makes everything pass again.
>
> I would guess this affects int8 etc on other platforms as well (assuming
> they use our snprintf and not the libc one), but I haven't checked it.
>
> //Magnus
>
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
