On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:27:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It is inarguable that increasing the sample size increases the accuracy of > a study, especially when diversity of the subject is unknown. It is known > that reducing a sample size increases probability of error in any poll or > study. The required sample size depends on the variance of the whole. It > is mathmatically unsound to ASSUME any sample size is valid without > understanding the standard deviation of the set.
For large populations the accuracy of estimates of statistics based on random samples from that population are not very sensitve to population size and depends primarily on the sample size. So that you would not expect to need to use larger sample sizes on larger data sets for data sets over some minimum size. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly