"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After much thought, I believe the best way is to implement bufferpools
> (BPs). That is, we don't just have one bufferhash and one LRU, we have
> many pairs. We then work out some mapping by which a block can be known
> to be in a particular BP, then acquire the lock for that BP.
I think this is basically wrongheaded, because it achieves its reduction
in contention by a one-for-one sacrifice of cache allocation efficiency;
that is, any individual page is now fighting for survival in a pool only
1/Nth as large as before. We're going to lose more in I/O than we can
hope to save at the processor level.
I think a clock algorithm or something similar may be a reasonable way
to go, though.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
