>Karel Zak wrote > On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Can anyone think of a reason we aren't inlining > MemoryContextSwitchTo() > > in GCC builds, similarly to the way list_head() et al are handled? > > > > It wouldn't be a huge gain, but I consistently see > MemoryContextSwitchTo > > eating a percent or three of most profiles. > > Sounds good. > > I think we can inlining all MemoryContext functions which check memory > context header and call context->metods->...() only. An example > MemoryContextAlloc() that is very often called from code too.
Yes, thats good. But why MemoryContextSwitchTo ? That seems to come out much lower than MemoryContextAllocZeroAligned or MemoryContextAlloc on the profiles I've seen. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
