On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:27:05PM +1300, Oliver Jowett wrote: > Oliver Jowett wrote: > >Having the close fail > >because of an intervening savepoint rollback isn't great -- the error > >will cause an unexpected failure of the current transaction. > > Never mind -- I just reread the protocol docs, and it's safe to close a > nonexistant portal. Did this previously issue a warning, or something > similar? I'm sure I had seen problems in this area in the past..
Not sure ... however I remember somebody complained because the SQL level interface differed from the protocol level one on this point. -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "In a specialized industrial society, it would be a disaster to have kids running around loose." (Paul Graham) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org