Ühel kenal päeval (pühapäev, 23. jaanuar 2005, 15:49-0600), kirjutas Jim C. Nasby: > Sorry if this is old, but I couldn't find it in the archives... > > How difficult would it be to provide a means to define a trigger in one > statement? Something like a combination of CREATE TRIGGER and CREATE > FUNCTION? Being able to define them seperately is awesome for generic > cases where you can use one function for a bunch of different tables, > but it's a pain in the cases where you need a unique trigger for one > table.
The same is true for the need to define RETURN TYPE of a function separately from the function. So: How difficult would it be to provide a means to define a function and its return type in one statement? -- Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
