* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So is it firm policy that changes that require a catversion update > > cannot be made during the 8.1 cycle? > > Not yet --- I suggested it but didn't get any yeas or nays. I don't > feel this is solely core's decision anyway ... what do the assembled > hackers think?
Don't know if I count, but I've noticed a number of things that people
are working on that require initdb's and I think they'd be nice to allow
in 8.1 unless the 8.1 cycle is *very* short. I'd also like to get group
ownership & roles in soon, if possible (and if I find enough time to
finish and properly test it).
> One way to have our cake and eat it too would be for someone to
> resurrect pg_upgrade during this devel cycle. Anyone feel like
> working on that?
Of course, this would be really nice too..
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
