On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:48:00AM +1100, Neil Conway wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 18:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I have already > > suggested to core that we should insist on 8.1 not requiring an initdb, > > so as to ensure that people will migrate up to it easily from 8.0. > > So is it firm policy that changes that require a catversion update > cannot be made during the 8.1 cycle?
Hmm. That means my shared dependency patch cannot go in, nor anything I do about shared row locking. Fortunately that leaves the multitable truncate and the C "install" replacement free to be applied. -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) You liked Linux a lot when he was just the gawky kid from down the block mowing your lawn or shoveling the snow. But now that he wants to date your daughter, you're not so sure he measures up. (Larry Greenemeier) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
