On Monday 29 November 2004 23:52, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > don't we normally announce if initdb is required on new beta releases? We > > should. > > It was sloppy that we didn't do that for beta5, and I apologize for it. > > One problem is that we don't have a defined place for per-beta-version > release notes. The current structure of release.sgml doesn't cater for > it --- and I doubt we want to permanently memorialize beta-version > issues anyway. Any thoughts? >
Do the beta changelogs ever end up any place permanent? (ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v8.0.0beta/ChangeLog-Beta4-to-Beta5) We could put a more prominant "**INITDB REQUIRED**" announcement in those when it is required. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
