> What about > for i in ... > ... new.(tg_argv[i]) ...
Ooof! <clutches chest, falls to ground groaning> Constants or digits or nothing, then <gets up, dusts himself off> > MHO: this is a really ugly wart on the language, and it does not solve > the problems people would want to solve. It might solve *your* problem > but that's not enough to justify a wart of this size. <falls down again> But my warts are beautiful! OK, fair enough. I had to try. > We do need to do something about the fact that EXECUTE can't access > plpgsql variables, though I'm afraid that fixing that is going to > require a rather complete overhaul of plpgsql :-(. But it needs one > anyway. Look forward to seeing it. Matt ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
