Andrew, Peter,
> >It seems that in the new PL/Perl, the result of the spi_exec_query
> >function changes in meaning depending on the command. For a SELECT,
> >the value of
> >
> >$res->{rows}
> >
> >is a reference to an array of the result rows.
> >
> >For a different command
> >
> >$res->{rows}
> >
> >is a scalar containing the number of affected rows. I think this is a
> >poor design. Couldn't we have a different result field that always
> >contains the number of rows?
Hmmm ... while contextual data changes is perlish, substituting a scalar for
an arrayref is going a little far. I agree with Peter, if the second # is
needed, {nrows} makes more sense.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
