Tom Lane wrote: > We keep hoping someone will step up to the plate and rewrite it, > instead. Per previous discussion, the type really ought to be a thin > layer over "numeric", with most likely no operations of its own > except I/O conversion.
And what would it do with it? Add a currency symbol? Which one? Which form? Where? Format the numbers some way? Sounds like a big mess. Drop it and use to_char. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
