On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:46:00PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > One can have many different semantics, here are 3 versions: > > 1) You release savepoints in any order > 2) You release savepoints in reverse order > 3) You release any savepoints and later ones then the > one you released are automatically released. > > I don't see any of these as absurd. The ansi spec uses number 3.
Ah-ha, now I see what I failed to see previously: all later savepoints are also released! This makes a lot more sense. So "release" is exactly like commit nested, allowing several levels to be "committed". -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "La fuerza no está en los medios físicos sino que reside en una voluntad indomable" (Gandhi) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
