-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I agree. The stuff is certainly accessible in PG-specific tables, so > the argument that we are missing functionality doesn't hold any water > IMHO. The question is whether we have to keep information_schema > pristine. I think that you and Stephan have made enough concrete > points that the answer to that has to be "stick to the standard". If there is that much clamor for this, why not make a new schema, such as "pginformation_schema" People could then tweak the views to their heart's content, while keeping 100% compliance. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200407012226 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFA5MfzvJuQZxSWSsgRAmyaAKCjbKre5ZuDpJnVA6rGjnAgNaIwvACgvRJN VxhiNWiYUCW8AfUBOUd/vEw= =SUM9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
