On P, 2004-06-27 at 17:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What do I need to do in order to get the width specifier into my type?
>
> Rewrite the grammar. Width modifiers are only supported on types that
> are hard-wired into the grammar, mainly because they look way too much
> like function calls to be distinguished without special hacking.
>
> Consider for example the implications of the fact that this works:
>
> regression=# select numeric(17,10) '1.23';
> numeric
> --------------
> 1.2300000000
> (1 row)
>
> bison has to decide *before scanning beyond the left parenthesis*
> whether "numeric" is a function name or a type name.
>
> If you can think of a more general solution, I'm all ears, but it looks
> like a hard problem that would require considerable rethinking of the
> present grammar for these things.
can't we make type(width) an actual function which returns another type
?
this would make it even possible to add support for things like
NUMBER(17,10) as an alias for NUMERIC(17,10) as an user-level addon.
---------------
Hannu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
