Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But...it seems kind of hacky to scan it again for owners and privs - are > you sure you want me to go that way?
If there's not a big performance penalty, sure. Being fully compatible
with existing archive files is a sufficient win to justify sins much
worse than this one.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
