Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is why I proposed originally to keep the non-transactional behavior
> for Parse messages, but transactional for SQL PREPARE. The latter can
> be said to be inside the transaction and should behave like so. I think
> this lowers the surprise factor.
It seems like we are closing in on an agreement that that is what should
happen.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
