Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 2) pg_restore needs to be more tolerant with certain kinds of errors.
> Hmmm, dunno about this - it wasn't on my radar really. I'll experiment > with it, but I don't think I'm going to have time before June 30th :( I think we dealt with this already: pg_restore has been taught that the correct response to a SQL command error is to report it and forge ahead, not curl up and die. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings