Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if you take a local snapshot of the global at the beginning of
> your transaction then the visible changes at any point are those from
> transactions that commited before your transaction started. That's
> well-defined, at least, and appears to be pretty much the same as the
> standard read commited isolation level.
no, read committed would see any other updates that have been committed since
the start of your transaction.
For some linear aggregates you could start with the initcond, apply all the
local updates and whenever you have to read the actual value then use the
global variable at that time. But not all aggregates can be handled that way.
I think all the standard ones could be though, sum(), count(), stddev(), etc.
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
