Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> [blink] This seems to miss out on the actual point of the thread (hash > >> bucket size shouldn't be a disk page) in favor of an entirely > >> unsupported sub-suggestion. > > > Yes, I was unsure of the text myself. I have changed it to: > > * Allow hash buckets to fill disk pages, rather than being > > sparse > > OK, though maybe "pack hash index buckets onto disk pages more > efficiently" would be clearer.
OK, updated. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
