Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Sunday 30 May 2004 21:33, Tom Lane wrote: > > Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was toying around with idea of converting all the memory related > > > parameters in postgresql.conf to kilobytes for simplicity and > > > uniformity. > > > > Why is that a good idea? > > Right now following are measured in pages > wal_buffers > shared_buffers > effective_cachesize > > Following are in kbs > work_mem > maintenance_work_mem > max_stack_depth > > while rest of the memory parameters are in kb. I thought being uniform would > be good. Besides it will make it independent of page size as well.
Sounds good to me. How are you handling cases where the value has to be a multiple of page size --- rounding or throwing an error? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
