On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:53:19 -0300, > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Not true ... you just have to fix your definition of what a feature is ... > > a feature is an improvement to the system, whether it be new > > functionality, or improved performance ... I consider the work Tom did on > > the IN performance in 7.4 to have been a major feature, considering that > > it made use of it *alot* more effective ... > > Personally, I found the 7.4 prebeta had a number of minor features that I > wanted. So far I haven't seen many things of particular interest to me > in 7.5. I haven't played with it yet, since there has been what appears > to be some pretty significant changes in some fundemental parts of 7.5 > and as such there appears to be more risk than there was at this point in > 7.4s release cycle. > > Based on what I read about several of the "big" projects, it seems like > the difference between a June 1 beta and a July 1 beta is worth taking > the extra month to have a better chance at getting some of these projects in.
Key words: "better chance" ... it doesn't mean that *any* of them will get done even in that extra month, you are speculating that that one month will make a difference. Then, when that month is up, and nothing does materialize (devil's advocate here), do we add another month to 'have a better chance'? Where does it end? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
