On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > Sure, you can work around the lack of a Win32 port with Cygwin, and > > > maybe use replication in place of PITR, but the big question is are you > > > hitting a large precentage of users with an enhancement. > > > > I'm not sure that the initial version of PITR will be a good replacement > > for replication. > > > > > I am sure i > > > can get some "me too's" for your improvements, but it doesn't represeent > > > dramatic new functionality for PostgreSQL. > > > > For me the vacuum delay *does* represent a "dramatic new functionality" > > and I was quite disappointed that the simple version did not make it into 7.4. > > Agreed, but you are a "me too", not a huge percentage of our userbase.
How do you know? Have you polled our complete userbase? > Basically, after 6-7 months of development, I want more than a vacuum > patch and a new cache replacement policy. I want something big, in > fact, several big things. Most likely won't happen, since what is considered big by you isn't necessarily what is considered big by someone else ... as Hannu, and I believe, Jan, have so far pointed out to you ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
