Actually, it occurs to me that the SET WITHOUT CLUSTER form CAN recurse. Should I make it do that, even though the CLUSTER ON form cannot?
I just thought about this. CLUSTER is more of a storage-level specification, rather than a logical one. Seems it is OK that WITOUTH CLUSTER not recurse into inherited tables, especially since the CLUSTER command does not.
The patch I submitted earlier already does do recursion - I don't see why it shouldn't really. It's better than failing saying that legal grammar is in fact illegal :)
Chris
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
