On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > I guess my point is really "do you want to freeze on June 1 if *none* of > > > these features are done?" > > > > No, I agree that that would be foolish ... but there has also been alot > > done on the code over the past few months that even *one* of those > > features should be enough to put it over the top ... > > But we should have at least one done before setting a freeze date, and > the freeze date should be one month in the future. Right now we have > none.
Now, that logic *doesn't* follow ... freeze date == that one feature makes more sense ... or freeze date == one month from May 1st *or* one feature, whichever is longer makes sense ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
