Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At a minimum, we should indicate we dropped the cluster on the index.
[shrug] If you're going to make me do that, I might as well reinstall
the bit on the new index. The code's problem is it doesn't know that
any of the indexes it dropped were clustered, and finding that out is
90% of the issue.
What I want to know is whether it is sensible to mark the revised index
as clustered, given that its semantics might be significantly different
from before.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
