On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 22:26, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Right. What I was saying is that we don't need pg_subtrans info,
> > because that's only needed while the subtransaction is marked as
> > "subcommitted" but it's parent hasn't committed or aborted yet. The
> > subcommitted status is changed to committed/aborted when the main
> > transaction commits or aborts; at recovery time, we already know if that
> > happenned or not so we can mark it right away.
>
> Maybe I'm just not following you, which seems likely.
>
> Surely it is possible that a subtrans could abort, yet the fulltrans
> commits. Yet that doesn't in any way imply that the subtrans should
> change from aborted to committed?
The subtransaction will be recorded as aborted in pg_clog (I mean there
will be a XLog record saying that it aborted). That protects it from
showing as committed, no matter what happens to the parent xact.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La tristeza es un muro entre dos jardines" (Khalil Gibran)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
