Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help > >>to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most > >>likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well. > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > >>As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases. > >>If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it > >>into contrib I can live with that. > > > > > > I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib, > > but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to > > point out the transactional risks. > > this should not be a problem. > I can intregrate all necessary information there. > > folks, let's do a poll ... > who is for it - who is against it ...
Is it better in /contrib or gborg? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
