"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would guess that better merging might be a real motivation for
> people. If a patch that takes a month to develop can still apply
> cleanly despite significant code drift in the interrem, I could see
> that as a real motivating factor.
Not here. You want me to trust some bit of code (with absolutely zero
understanding of the source text it's hacking on) to figure out how to
resolve conflicting patches? That sounds like a recipe for big-time
unhappiness.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
