Marty Scholes wrote:


2. Put them on an actual (or mirrored actual) spindle Pros: * Keeps WAL and data file I/O separate Cons: * All of the non array drives are still slower than the array

Are you sure this is a problem? The dbt-2 benchmarks from osdl run on an 8-way Intel computer with several raid arrays distributed to 40 disks. IIRC it generates around 1.5 MB wal logs per second - well withing the capability of a single drive. My laptop can write around 10 MB/sec (measured with dd if=/dev/zero of=fill and vmstat), fast drives should be above 20 MB/sec.
How much wal data is generated by large postgres setups? Are there any setups that are limited by the wal logs.


--
   Manfred



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to