Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This seems, um, hard to believe.  Did he shut down the standard syncer
> daemon?  I have never seen a Unix system that would allow more than
> thirty seconds' worth of unwritten buffers to accumulate, and would not
> care to use one if it existed.

Well it was Solaris so it didn't have the BSD 30s sync style strategy. But
this was a large NFS file transfer to another host on a 100Mb/s network. In
30s there could be a lot of writes buffered up. 

I'm not saying the behaviour was ideal, and I don't know exactly why it
interfered with anything else. But I'm not entirely surprised either.

-- 
greg


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to