Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This seems, um, hard to believe. Did he shut down the standard syncer > daemon? I have never seen a Unix system that would allow more than > thirty seconds' worth of unwritten buffers to accumulate, and would not > care to use one if it existed.
Well it was Solaris so it didn't have the BSD 30s sync style strategy. But this was a large NFS file transfer to another host on a 100Mb/s network. In 30s there could be a lot of writes buffered up. I'm not saying the behaviour was ideal, and I don't know exactly why it interfered with anything else. But I'm not entirely surprised either. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html