"Ramanujam H S Iyengar" <hals_ramu ( at ) hotmail ( dot ) com> writes:
iam in need of a function through which i can get a Relation Node given its name ..
precisely the same one equivalent to " RelationSysNameGetRelation " .. which works for all types of relations (system and user tables)

The reason RelationSysNameGetRelation only works for system relations is
that it assumes the schema name is "pg_catalog".  For non-system
relations you cannot do a lookup based only on relation name, because
there's no certainty that the result is unique.


There are some functions in catalog/namespace.c that can do lookup of an
unqualified name relative to the current schema search path, if that's
what you want.

Thanks a lot, The function RelnameGetRelid(const char *) is working for me !!

Iam trying to test for some patch in the code of the Optimizer(planner) and so I need some C functions, which does the job.

The optimizer has no need, ever, to find a relation by name; all it ever
sees are predigested relation OIDs.  So you are not making a lot of
sense here.  You certainly cannot assume that a search-path lookup is
appropriate for a relation that the optimizer is dealing with.
regards, tom lane

Iam trying to put in some other module of optimizer that we have developed, which works on relation name and gives the optimal plan. Iam trying to convert the plans given by this(our) optimizer to the
Plan structure of PostgreSQL. So finally i have to convert the Relation names back to their relOids.


All this in the process of using the execution engine of Postgres for our optimizer module !! :-)

Thats why i was asking !!

Thanks

-Ramu

_________________________________________________________________
Take a loan. Win great prizes! Handsome prizes to be won! Take a loan & win TV, Fridge & many more prizes ! http://go.msnserver.com/IN/44044.asp



---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to