On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Neil Conway wrote:
> No, 'NaN' is legal float4/float8/numeric input whether UNSAFE_FLOATS
> is defined or not.
Yes, the tests are:
if (fabs(val) > FLOAT8_MAX)
if (val != 0.0 && fabs(val) < FLOAT8_MIN)
and only infinity and not NaN will trigger the overflow. I read it wrong
first.
> Well, CheckFloat4Val() is needed to ensure that the input fits in a
> 'float' (rather than just a 'double').
Sure, for Float4 (maybe working with float in C instead of double and this
check would make a difference, but I havn't really thought about that).
> What number would you like 'Infinity'::float4 and 'Infinity'::float8
> to produce? Is this actually useful functionality?
I would like them to produce the IEEE 754 number 'infinity' (usually
writte 'Inf' in other languages).
> As for it being in the SQL standard, using Acrobat's "text search"
> feature finds zero instances of "infinity" (case insensitive) in the
> 200x draft spec. I haven't checked any more thoroughly than that,
> though.
If they say that it should use IEEE 754 math, then they do say that
Infinity is a number, just like it is in C and lots of other languages
with IEEE 754 math. Being as old as it is, I would guess that the standard
doesn't really say much at all about floats.
Why should pg not do the same as most (all?) other language that use IEEE
754 math?
--
/Dennis Björklund
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
