Thank you very much for your reply. I'd like to discuss the why.
I don't think letting them share data and logs could gain me something.
And if I have 2 databases totally not relevant, I think the most natural
way is to make them totally seperated. Does the sharing buys me
anything? If not, what's the reason of doing it?
Thank you very much.
--Hong Ge
Quoting "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > What should I do if I want to have 2 completely seperated databases
> in
> > PostgreSQL? I want each database to have its own data, log and
> > everything needed to access that database. I don't want them to
> share
> > anything. Has anyone done this before? Or,
> > could anyone give me some clue of how to do this?
>
> You're telling us what you want, but not the why. The why may help
> us to
> figure out both how to do it, and whether or not it's a good idea.
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
