Tom Lane wrote: > I got the impression that Thomas wanted this in order to kluge up > some kind of two-phase-commit support, in which case he really needs > to get control at the point where we're just about to really truly > commit (ie, write the commit WAL record). That's certainly not a > location where we want random users to be inserting code; as such > I don't think that exposing a callback hook is the right answer. > My advice to him is to go in and change the code.
Yes, it can't be used for more advanced stuff like 2-phase commit. I know some were asking for callbacks on (clean) session exit, and it seemed like a natural extension. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
