"[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Stark)" stated in
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > FreeBSD 4.7/4.9 and the UFS filesystem
>>
>> Hm, okay, I'm pretty sure that that combination wouldn't report ENOSPC
>> at close(). We need to fix the code to check close's return value,
>> probably, but it seems we still lack a clear explanation of what
>> happened to your database.
>
> The traditional Unix filesystems certainly don't return errors at close.
> Even NFS doesn't traditionally do so. I think NFSv3 can if the server
> disappears after the client obtains a lease on a piece of the file, but
> I'm not sure if ENOSPC is a possible failure mode.
[sNip]
Why shouldn't the close() function return an error? If an invalid
file handle was passed to it, it most certainly should indicate this since
it's always possible for a separate thread to close it first (or other
reasons as well).
--
Randolf Richardson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
"We are anti-spammers. You will confirm
subscriptions. Resistance is futile."
Please do not eMail me directly when responding
to my postings in the newsgroups.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
