Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, that seems to have fixed it, so my next question is how did it get > corrupt?
The nearest culprit seems to be whatever you did in analyze.c ;-). It's not obvious to me how analyze.c would manage to mess up an index, since it's nowhere near the index-handling code, but I'd sure want to examine your patch before looking further afield for an explanation. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]