Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:17:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have > > > > an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release. > > > > Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball > > > > packaging, and INSTALL too. > > > > > > What about having them generated from some Make target, so the curious > > > user could generate it on his own, and is also built by Marc's > > > ficticious package-prep target? > > > > He would have to have the SGML tools installed, and that isn't > > trivial/likely. > > True, but Peter could very easily have HISTORY generated and on the web > page as part of his docs build process ... then 'HISTORY' in CVS would > just be a URL to that online version, while 'HISTORY' in a release would > be the full HISTORY file ... ?
Yep, I just came to the same conclusion. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
