Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > The 14 december I submitted a patch that implements named function > arguments. So far no one have said anything about that. It would be nice > if someone could look at it and either reject, accept, put on queue, or > anything else. > > The patch is very big (400k), but most of that size comes from trival > changes on the initial system tables.
Uh, I don't remember seeing your patch, and I don't have it in my mailbox? Which email list did you send it to? Perhaps the email is stuck waiting for Marc to accept it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
