Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> why not do both, but deprecate the use of all in the docs? say with an
>> eventual goal of removing the use of all altogether in 2 releases?
> The extra value is fairly low IMNSHO if we can distinguish between a
> magical and a non-magical 'all' - see the patch I just submitted.
Also, your point about the special sameuser and samegroup keywords is a
good one. We should make those all work consistently (ie, quoting makes
it not a keyword). Going in the "*" direction would only make sense
if that were the only special case --- but it isn't. I don't think we
want to start choosing random symbols for sameuser, samegroup, and other
stuff we might think of in future.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
