On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 01:07, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Hi, > > Is there demand for this syntax: > > ALTER SEQUENCE ON table(col) CYCLE 100; > > It would allow us to become sequence-name independent...
I think the right approach to this problem would be to implement IDENTITIES and GENERATORS per 2k3 spec -- almost what you show here. Check DB2 docs for examples. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
