On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:32:18PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> I suspect it might be because I'm running in a jail'd environment, but > >> what should I be looking at to confirm? > >> > >> could not create socket for statistics collector: Protocol not supported > > > You probably shouldn't worry about it. Maybe this message could > > be made more clear too. > > It probably does socket(AF_INET6), which fails, and gives the > > above message, and then tries socket(AF_INET) which works. > > If you don't see something about "disabling statistics collector for > lack of working socket" then there's no reason to worry. > > I'm surprised you don't see any similar message about failing to create > an IPv6 postmaster listen socket though?
Nope, this is everything from the startup: Nov 23 03:30:58 pgsql74 postgres[59990]: [1-1] LOG: could not create socket for statistics collector: Protocol not supported Nov 23 03:30:58 pgsql74 postgres[59993]: [2-1] LOG: database system was shut down at 2003-11-23 03:22:39 GMT Nov 23 03:30:58 pgsql74 postgres[59993]: [3-1] LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/9B0B8C Nov 23 03:30:58 pgsql74 postgres[59993]: [4-1] LOG: redo record is at 0/9B0B8C; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE Nov 23 03:30:58 pgsql74 postgres[59993]: [5-1] LOG: next transaction ID: 534; next OID: 17142 Nov 23 03:30:58 pgsql74 postgres[59993]: [6-1] LOG: database system is ready Is it easy to do a quick message change to state that it was the IPv6 socket that failed? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
