Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is > > > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own > > > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here? > > > > Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several > > companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL > > and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not. > > We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ...
And I know CommandPrompt doesn't care either. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
